Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

origin/cranelift-rebase #92990

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed

origin/cranelift-rebase #92990

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

dtolnay
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay commented Jan 17, 2022

I found this dead branch in rust-lang/rust. I am about to delete it but making a PR first so that the commits are still recoverable if someone was counting on it. The commits are on top of #84746 so I'm inferring that pushing these to rust-lang/rust was done by mistake as part of the work on #84749.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Some changes occured to rustc_codegen_cranelift

cc @bjorn3

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jan 17, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 17, 2022
@dtolnay dtolnay closed this Jan 17, 2022
@dtolnay dtolnay deleted the cranelift-rebase branch January 17, 2022 02:01
@bjorn3
Copy link
Member

bjorn3 commented Jan 17, 2022

The commits are on top of #84746 so I'm inferring that pushing these to rust-lang/rust was done by mistake as part of the work on #84749

Probably

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants